Using Google Photos to pick your wedding album photos
It works, and for some couples it is the right answer. Here is what it costs and what to watch for.
Yes, you can pick wedding album photos in Google Photos by favouriting them, but you have to upload the entire delivery first. For a full-resolution wedding folder that is typically tens of gigabytes, which means hours of uploading and storage that counts against your Google account quota.
It is the right choice if your photos are already in Google Photos, or if you need to choose from a phone or share the selection with family. It is the wrong choice if the folder is sitting on your laptop and you just want to get through it.
How the selection actually works there
- Upload the delivery folder. Choose Original quality, not the storage-saving option, or you are working from re-compressed copies.
- Open the album or the date range and go photo by photo.
- Favourite the keepers. Favourites collect into their own view.
- Select the favourites and download them, which produces a zip.
- Send that to your photographer, or send the filename list.
That is a workable flow. The friction is all in step one and step four.
What it is genuinely good at
- It works on a phone. No local tool can say that for a folder of photos, and if you want to pick on the sofa over a week rather than at a desk in one evening, this is the option.
- Both of you can do it. Shared albums mean two people can favourite in the same place, which is otherwise awkward.
- Search is excellent. Finding every photo with a specific person in it is genuinely useful during the story-check pass.
- It doubles as a backup and a gallery. If you were going to upload the wedding anyway, the selection is close to free.
- Nothing to install.
What it costs you
Upload time
A wedding delivery with several thousand full-resolution frames, and RAW files if you were given them, commonly runs to tens of gigabytes. On a typical home connection that is measured in hours, and it has to finish before you can start. If the folder is already on your drive, you are paying that cost for nothing.
Storage
Uploads count against your Google account quota, which is shared with Gmail and Drive. A wedding delivery will not fit in the free allowance, so this usually means a paid storage plan — check current pricing, as it changes. That is fine as an ongoing backup and expensive as a one-off culling session.
The compression trap
This is the one that actually causes problems. If the photos go up in the storage-saving mode rather than original quality, the copies you download are re-encoded and smaller than what your photographer delivered. Send those back and they cannot be printed at album size. Always verify you uploaded at original quality, and always send your photographer filenames rather than re-downloaded files if there is any doubt.
RAW and HEIC handling
HEIC is fine. RAW files are handled inconsistently depending on the camera, and if your photographer delivered RAW alongside JPEG you can end up with duplicate-looking entries that make the pass confusing. Upload only the JPEG folder if you have the choice.
It is a grid, not a queue
Google Photos shows you a grid, and a grid invites comparison — which is exactly what makes culling slow. There is no one-key keep-and-advance, so each decision costs a tap, a look and a scroll rather than a single keypress.
Google Photos vs a local tool
| Google Photos | Local browser tool | |
|---|---|---|
| Setup before you start | Hours of uploading | Open the folder |
| Cost | Storage plan for a large delivery | Free |
| Phone and tablet | Yes | No |
| Keyboard-driven pass | No | Yes |
| Sharing with family | Yes, built in | No |
| Search by person | Yes | No |
| Original files untouched | Depends on upload quality | Yes, copies only |
| Works offline | No | Yes, after the page loads |
Which one should you use?
- Use Google Photos if the wedding is already uploaded, if you need to pick on a phone, if you want family to help, or if you wanted a cloud backup regardless.
- Use a local tool if the delivery folder is on your drive, if it is large, if you do not want a storage plan, or if you want to finish in one sitting rather than over a fortnight.
Either way, the method is the same — reject on instinct, keep one frame per burst, then refine. That is covered in the culling guide.
The free tool for the picking part
Shaadi Pic opens the wedding folder straight from your
drive — nothing is uploaded, there is no account and there is no charge.
Left arrow skips, right arrow keeps, Z undoes. Your keepers
are copied into a /selected subfolder with filenames
unchanged, ready to zip and send back.
Open your folder and start picking →
Free · runs locally · no sign-up · needs a laptop running Chrome, Edge, Brave, Arc or Opera
Frequently asked questions
- Can you use Google Photos to select wedding album photos?
- Yes. Upload the delivery at original quality, favourite the keepers, then download or list the favourites. The main costs are the upload time for a large folder and the storage it consumes against your Google account quota.
- Does Google Photos compress wedding photos?
- It depends on the upload setting. Storage-saver uploads are re-encoded and smaller than the originals; original-quality uploads are not. If you plan to send downloaded files back to your photographer, upload at original quality or send filenames instead.
- How much storage does a wedding delivery need?
- A full-resolution wedding folder with several thousand frames commonly runs to tens of gigabytes, more if RAW files are included. That exceeds the free allowance on most accounts, so expect to need a paid storage plan.
- Is Google Photos faster than a local culling tool?
- No, for two reasons. You cannot start until the upload finishes, and there is no single-key keep-and-advance, so each decision costs a tap and a scroll rather than one keypress. It is more convenient, not faster.
- Can my partner and I favourite photos together in Google Photos?
- Yes, via a shared album, and this is one of the things it genuinely does better than a local tool. Be aware that culling separately tends to produce two lists and a negotiation, so it still works best done together.